• Club announcement
    New manager appointed
    Tranmere Rovers have appointed Darrell Clarke as the club’s new manager.

So next season

Am on mobile

Member
Joined
4 Jan 2023
Messages
2,791
Player
Muir
Manager
King
Lets have a look ae need a new manager as soon as possible.

We need the takeover done ASAP

We need a total clearing of players and staff and build a fast strong team with some balls and fight,


Lets just hope wild can finish the job off
And go away to a different club.
He hasn't done it for me if i am honest
Upwards and on wards
 
Lets have a look ae need a new manager as soon as possible.

We need the takeover done ASAP

We need a total clearing of players and staff and build a fast strong team with some balls and fight,


Lets just hope wild can finish the job off
And go away to a different club.
He hasn't done it for me if i am honest
Upwards and on wards
Relegation may kill the take over stone dead. The current situation of no manager and a thin squad moving forward, ignoring the more extreme view of sack everyone, may also see off the suitor.
I doubt there is more than one bid with anyone else at the preliminary thinking stage. MP would surely have sped the thing through if alternatives were there, they probably just aren't.
Bottom line we survive and no take over swiftly follows, it just drags on. Imminent may need removing from the current lexicon.
 
If we stay up and there’s a take over, we have an opportunity to wipe the slate clean. Players under contract next season:

Plant, McGhee, O’Connor, Turnbull, Brough, Kenneh, Williams, Smith, Whitaker, Jennings.

The only player who I would consider keeping who is out of contract is McGowan, I think he could do a job, the rest can go.

Smith, O’Connor and Whitaker could be the spine of a new side.

I would try get rid of Turnbull and possibly Brough and Kenneh too.

Desperately need to reduce the age of the squad (which I think has been overlooked as one of the key factors in all the injuries), reduce the amount of mid-season turnover in players, and inject some pace.

We also need a proper 2nd Goalkeeper in case McGhee doesn’t recover well or has another injury. Situation has been farcical this season.

Lastly I would insist we abandon this 3-4-3/5-2-3/3-4-2-1/3-6-1/3-7-0/5-4-1 nonsense we have played all season. Best 45 mins of football was with 4 at the back (Cheltenham) I wonder why.

Although if we go down/Palios still here, all above is probably moot points!
 
Warrington and Ironside are under contract for a further 2 years
 
If we survive on Saturday and Palios is in charge next season then we will probably be relegated.
If we are relegated, I think we will struggle in the division below if he is still here.
 
Warrington and Ironside are under contract for a further 2 years
Both probably have release clause if we go down. Before anyone makes an uneducated quip, all that means is they have the right to walk if they want to. Not to our advantage!
Plenty would take ironside and I know Warrington and Plant, also under contract?, were wanted by the same mid table side. The former liked the idea of home and the other Crosby which worked well.
 
If we are relegated, I think we will struggle in the division below if he is still here.
Yes I sadly agree. If we go down and any takeover falls away, the toxicity against Palios will carry on and we know how hard it is to get out of the NL. We can’t trust Palios to make a decent managerial appointment and with his health etc his appetite for the club wouldn’t be great.
 
Yes I sadly agree. If we go down and any takeover falls away, the toxicity against Palios will carry on and we know how hard it is to get out of the NL. We can’t trust Palios to make a decent managerial appointment and with his health etc his appetite for the club wouldn’t be great.
There is a third way, where Palios steps back and becomes passive owner. Then we may have a live within your means policy as the credit lines Mark has been able to organise, almost certainly won't carry on.
You are talking the latter days of PJ without the reluctant but very real big funds in the background.
 
I can’t see Palios ever taking a step back, unless for health reasons he had no choice.

I can imagine it’s his interference that has contributed in part to the lack of sale, fan park issues and his all round massive ego never taking responsibility for anything.
That is some imagination at work. He clearly intended to be long gone by now. Pretty sure he thought the NY group were completing a year ago, sort of glad they didn't and other details don't fill me with any confidence.
The fan park is an epic trust failure, Palios's fault was giving some volunteers far too much executive room.
 
That is some imagination at work. He clearly intended to be long gone by now. Pretty sure he thought the NY group were completing a year ago, sort of glad they didn't and other details don't fill me with any confidence.
The fan park is an epic trust failure, Palios's fault was giving some volunteers far too much executive room.
The fan park is also the clubs failure to do there due diligence and go through everything beforehand, a massive let down by both groups
 
The fan park is also the clubs failure to do there due diligence and go through everything beforehand, a massive let down by both groups
Love the way Palios should or should not interfere when appropriate to the argument. For me he should have questioned a highly dubious plan and smelt a rat long before he did.
The legacy is he questioned the trusts claims and their eventual response was most unconvincing. It will take a million to launch and probably trading losses of the same to reach profitability.
 
I don't believe the take-over is under threat if we were to be relegated, though that will be over one way or another by Saturday tea time, but I do, unfortunately, feel there is now some degree of threat from the regulatory process. If it isn't announced next week that the take-over has been approved by the EFL, or an explanation that it's close and expected, then I'd be worried. Both the wording of the Club statement in the accounts filings and the most recent article in the Athletic show that, maybe a little clumsily, the Club are indeed trying to move things along, but that indicates that the delays are, as the Athletic Article alluded to, down to Ascent not providing the required paperwork/evidence of the providence of all of the involved investors. Best case is that that is simply down to the length of time that lawyers take to operate but it may be an indication that there is more of a structural issue with the bid. I would believe that the Club, any statements aside, do want to complete with the current bidders, and do want to complete imminently as the alternative is grim. As such, I'm hoping that any administrative issues or regulatory issues are sorted quickly. The alternative, either the bid fails because we are relegated, or the bid fails (whether we stay up or not) due to regulatory refusal or the bidders simply get fed up or disillusioned with the process and pull out, would mean that any new bid is subject to the new rules under the new regulator. These are untested, but are orders of magnitude more strict than the EFL rules. As such it is entirely likely that the regulatory approval for any new bid would take at least a season. If the current bid doesn't complete, we will be operating on drastically reduced levels of funding, the current high level of funding, with the Palios' putting in substantial money weekly to cover wages isn't sustainable, nor actually is it likely to be allowed under the new regulations coming in. As such, we would need some very astute recruitment and a manager and coaching team that could get the best out of 'lower level' players, not impossible of course, but we may well find ourselves struggling. We need new owners, with new ideas and new blood, the takeover can't complete soon enough. I hope we hear something next week, I'm nervous we won't.
 
Maybe the conference has lower standards and that has been the dastardly plan all along.
On another forum a guy called Zint posts a lot of wacky stuff far worse than here.
He keeps claiming Palios has under invested, even after the £3 loss and an implied duplication this season. Whether you think we spend well or not, we would incur those losses in hopefully surviving or being mid table. Any modest gate income from being mid table would change little.
Fact is just to keep up the Jones we need to cover losses circa £300,000 pcm. We are well past the cup tie or player sale revenue solution now.
Vale did something we would find very hard to copy and come down with £10 debts ie overspending for the likes of Zint. When we got promoted we never got the equality of central funds until the Xmas window. I think we would have survived but remember two clubs were down already. Our best player this season was one Vale dumped.
My Saturday afternoon hobby is reliant on crazy funding, I predict a crash
 
Maybe the conference has lower standards and that has been the dastardly plan all along.
On another forum a guy called Zint posts a lot of wacky stuff far worse than here.
He keeps claiming Palios has under invested, even after the £3 loss and an implied duplication this season. Whether you think we spend well or not, we would incur those losses in hopefully surviving or being mid table. Any modest gate income from being mid table would change little.
Fact is just to keep up the Jones we need to cover losses circa £300,000 pcm. We are well past the cup tie or player sale revenue solution now.
Vale did something we would find very hard to copy and come down with £10 debts ie overspending for the likes of Zint. When we got promoted we never got the equality of central funds until the Xmas window. I think we would have survived but remember two clubs were down already. Our best player this season was one Vale dumped.
My Saturday afternoon hobby is reliant on crazy funding, I predict a crash
The National League is now covered by the Independent Football Regulator with the same rules and regulations as the EFL.
 
According to Palios he is still in talks with 3 parties although 1 of them has passed the efl tests. He thinks it should be done fairly quickly.

If 1 party has passed the tests then the deal has to go through in a matter of days and there's no point talking to the other parties
It depends what the deal with the one party is I suppose and how close the other two are. Mark will want the best outcome for him and Nicola and also, I imagine, the Club. I agree though that it cannot go on too long and that an early decision is essential so that planning for next season can start.
 
It depends what the deal with the one party is I suppose and how close the other two are. Mark will want the best outcome for him and Nicola and also, I imagine, the Club. I agree though that it cannot go on too long and that an early decision is essential so that planning for next season can start.
It needs sorting this week and the best deal for the club not for them.
 
Back
Top